Showing posts with label RESPA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label RESPA. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 21, 2016

What to Watch Out for with Your Mortgage Servicing Company

"Problems with payments head the list of consumer complaints about the companies that service home mortgages."




ARTICLE LINK (CLICK HERE)
A Virginia borrower complained that after making a monthly mortgage payment via credit union electronic transfer the bank servicing the mortgage denied receiving payment despite two confirmation faxes from the credit union. In Texas, a borrower said a new servicer took over a loan, never sent a bill or responded to attempts to set up an account and make payments and then posted the home for foreclosure. 
These are two of 3,910 complaints about mortgages sent to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau in July 2016. Mortgages represent the third-biggest category of complaints to the CFPB, behind debt collection and credit reporting. As of April 1, 2016, CFPB's online complaint system had handled nearly 860,000 complaints since it opened 2011, of which mortgages accounted for more than 223,000.
Mortgage complaints spiked during the last recession and housing downturn before falling to about their current level. Now they may be heading up again. During the first quarter of 2016, average monthly mortgage complaints were up 21% from the same period a year earlier, according to the CFPB.
Rocke Andrews, president of the Plano, Texas-based National Association of Mortgage Brokers, says during the downturn complaints tended to be about brokers but more recently concern servicers. One reason is that pricing pressure is causing servicer consolidation and efforts to reduce costs, he says.
"What you see now is there are probably five servicers that handle 75% of all servicing," Andrews says. "To make it profitable, you have to scale it up and do as much as you can automated. As a result, as a consumer, more than likely you're going to wind up with one of those automated systems when you call in for information."
Andrews says consumers with a problem can increase chances of a successful resolution by bypassing the automated systems -- often by pressing the "0" key -- and asking the human rep to speak with a supervisor. If that doesn't work, try hanging up and calling back, he suggests.
Complaints come in many varieties, but since 2011, most (51%) are "problems when you are unable to pay," according to the CFPB. Next is "making payments," cited by 31%. Complaints about applying, signing the agreement and receiving a credit offer are all single digit percentages.
Some problems are caused by borrowers confusing the servicer, which collects payments and disburses taxes and insurance, and the holder of the mortgage note. Borrowers may be upset that a servicer won't approve skipping a payment, when the borrower has to approve that, Andrews says.
Another common problem regards partial payments. Sometimes, such as during foreclosure proceedings, the amount owed may change after a payment is mailed and before it is received. The borrower may think payment has been made, when in fact it's been disallowed as a partial payment. New rules require servicers to tell borrowers upfront whether they will accept partial payments may help this problem, Andrews says.
While nearly a quarter of a million complaints to regulators sounds like a lot, Marina Walsh, a vice president with the Washington, D.C.-based Mortgage Bankers Association, notes that problems are typically handled before reaching the CFPB, and the complaint count is modest compared to the number of borrowers. "There are approximately 50 million outstanding mortgages in the U.S. and many more customer escalations or complaints are tracked and logged, then resolved directly by the mortgage servicer," Walsh says.
Walsh said dedicated phone numbers, customer service-friendly websites and better call center monitoring is helping to improve borrowers' experiences with servicers. "On the technology side, servicers have woken up and realized that they need to go digital especially for millennial borrowers," Walsh says. "This means revamping websites to provide more capabilities, offering seamless mobile options and generally moving toward a self-service and self-monitoring model preferred by some many borrowers, particularly Millenials."
  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

  • Please contact us if you need help or resources as we are here and happy to help!

  • Respectfully,

  • Dana Shafman
  • Managing Member
  • END Consulting
  • (888) 234-7006 Ext 101
  • Dana@ConsultingEND.com

  • www.TheDailyComplaint.com







What to Watch Out for with Your Mortgage Servicing Company

"Problems with payments head the list of consumer complaints about the companies that service home mortgages."




ARTICLE LINK (CLICK HERE)
A Virginia borrower complained that after making a monthly mortgage payment via credit union electronic transfer the bank servicing the mortgage denied receiving payment despite two confirmation faxes from the credit union. In Texas, a borrower said a new servicer took over a loan, never sent a bill or responded to attempts to set up an account and make payments and then posted the home for foreclosure. 
These are two of 3,910 complaints about mortgages sent to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau in July 2016. Mortgages represent the third-biggest category of complaints to the CFPB, behind debt collection and credit reporting. As of April 1, 2016, CFPB's online complaint system had handled nearly 860,000 complaints since it opened 2011, of which mortgages accounted for more than 223,000.
Mortgage complaints spiked during the last recession and housing downturn before falling to about their current level. Now they may be heading up again. During the first quarter of 2016, average monthly mortgage complaints were up 21% from the same period a year earlier, according to the CFPB.
Rocke Andrews, president of the Plano, Texas-based National Association of Mortgage Brokers, says during the downturn complaints tended to be about brokers but more recently concern servicers. One reason is that pricing pressure is causing servicer consolidation and efforts to reduce costs, he says.
"What you see now is there are probably five servicers that handle 75% of all servicing," Andrews says. "To make it profitable, you have to scale it up and do as much as you can automated. As a result, as a consumer, more than likely you're going to wind up with one of those automated systems when you call in for information."
Andrews says consumers with a problem can increase chances of a successful resolution by bypassing the automated systems -- often by pressing the "0" key -- and asking the human rep to speak with a supervisor. If that doesn't work, try hanging up and calling back, he suggests.
Complaints come in many varieties, but since 2011, most (51%) are "problems when you are unable to pay," according to the CFPB. Next is "making payments," cited by 31%. Complaints about applying, signing the agreement and receiving a credit offer are all single digit percentages.
Some problems are caused by borrowers confusing the servicer, which collects payments and disburses taxes and insurance, and the holder of the mortgage note. Borrowers may be upset that a servicer won't approve skipping a payment, when the borrower has to approve that, Andrews says.
Another common problem regards partial payments. Sometimes, such as during foreclosure proceedings, the amount owed may change after a payment is mailed and before it is received. The borrower may think payment has been made, when in fact it's been disallowed as a partial payment. New rules require servicers to tell borrowers upfront whether they will accept partial payments may help this problem, Andrews says.
While nearly a quarter of a million complaints to regulators sounds like a lot, Marina Walsh, a vice president with the Washington, D.C.-based Mortgage Bankers Association, notes that problems are typically handled before reaching the CFPB, and the complaint count is modest compared to the number of borrowers. "There are approximately 50 million outstanding mortgages in the U.S. and many more customer escalations or complaints are tracked and logged, then resolved directly by the mortgage servicer," Walsh says.
Walsh said dedicated phone numbers, customer service-friendly websites and better call center monitoring is helping to improve borrowers' experiences with servicers. "On the technology side, servicers have woken up and realized that they need to go digital especially for millennial borrowers," Walsh says. "This means revamping websites to provide more capabilities, offering seamless mobile options and generally moving toward a self-service and self-monitoring model preferred by some many borrowers, particularly Millenials."
  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

  • Please contact us if you need help or resources as we are here and happy to help!

  • Respectfully,

  • Dana Shafman
  • Managing Member
  • END Consulting
  • (888) 234-7006 Ext 101
  • Dana@ConsultingEND.com

  • www.TheDailyComplaint.com






What to Watch Out for with Your Mortgage Servicing Company

"Problems with payments head the list of consumer complaints about the companies that service home mortgages."




ARTICLE LINK (CLICK HERE)
A Virginia borrower complained that after making a monthly mortgage payment via credit union electronic transfer the bank servicing the mortgage denied receiving payment despite two confirmation faxes from the credit union. In Texas, a borrower said a new servicer took over a loan, never sent a bill or responded to attempts to set up an account and make payments and then posted the home for foreclosure. 
These are two of 3,910 complaints about mortgages sent to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau in July 2016. Mortgages represent the third-biggest category of complaints to the CFPB, behind debt collection and credit reporting. As of April 1, 2016, CFPB's online complaint system had handled nearly 860,000 complaints since it opened 2011, of which mortgages accounted for more than 223,000.
Mortgage complaints spiked during the last recession and housing downturn before falling to about their current level. Now they may be heading up again. During the first quarter of 2016, average monthly mortgage complaints were up 21% from the same period a year earlier, according to the CFPB.
Rocke Andrews, president of the Plano, Texas-based National Association of Mortgage Brokers, says during the downturn complaints tended to be about brokers but more recently concern servicers. One reason is that pricing pressure is causing servicer consolidation and efforts to reduce costs, he says.
"What you see now is there are probably five servicers that handle 75% of all servicing," Andrews says. "To make it profitable, you have to scale it up and do as much as you can automated. As a result, as a consumer, more than likely you're going to wind up with one of those automated systems when you call in for information."
Andrews says consumers with a problem can increase chances of a successful resolution by bypassing the automated systems -- often by pressing the "0" key -- and asking the human rep to speak with a supervisor. If that doesn't work, try hanging up and calling back, he suggests.
Complaints come in many varieties, but since 2011, most (51%) are "problems when you are unable to pay," according to the CFPB. Next is "making payments," cited by 31%. Complaints about applying, signing the agreement and receiving a credit offer are all single digit percentages.
Some problems are caused by borrowers confusing the servicer, which collects payments and disburses taxes and insurance, and the holder of the mortgage note. Borrowers may be upset that a servicer won't approve skipping a payment, when the borrower has to approve that, Andrews says.
Another common problem regards partial payments. Sometimes, such as during foreclosure proceedings, the amount owed may change after a payment is mailed and before it is received. The borrower may think payment has been made, when in fact it's been disallowed as a partial payment. New rules require servicers to tell borrowers upfront whether they will accept partial payments may help this problem, Andrews says.
While nearly a quarter of a million complaints to regulators sounds like a lot, Marina Walsh, a vice president with the Washington, D.C.-based Mortgage Bankers Association, notes that problems are typically handled before reaching the CFPB, and the complaint count is modest compared to the number of borrowers. "There are approximately 50 million outstanding mortgages in the U.S. and many more customer escalations or complaints are tracked and logged, then resolved directly by the mortgage servicer," Walsh says.
Walsh said dedicated phone numbers, customer service-friendly websites and better call center monitoring is helping to improve borrowers' experiences with servicers. "On the technology side, servicers have woken up and realized that they need to go digital especially for millennial borrowers," Walsh says. "This means revamping websites to provide more capabilities, offering seamless mobile options and generally moving toward a self-service and self-monitoring model preferred by some many borrowers, particularly Millenials."
  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

  • Please contact us if you need help or resources as we are here and happy to help!

  • Respectfully,

  • Dana Shafman
  • Managing Member
  • END Consulting
  • (888) 234-7006 Ext 101
  • Dana@ConsultingEND.com

  • www.TheDailyComplaint.com





Thursday, August 4, 2016

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Expands Foreclosure Protections

 Category:Press Release

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Expands Foreclosure Protections

Updated Servicing Rule Provides Surviving Family Members and Other Homeowners with Same Protections as Original Borrowers
 
Washington, D.C. – The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) today finalized new measures to ensure that homeowners and struggling borrowers are treated fairly by mortgage servicers. The updated rule requires servicers to provide certain borrowers with foreclosure protections more than once over the life of the loan, clarifies borrower protections when the servicing of a loan is transferred, and provides important loan information to borrowers in bankruptcy. The changes also help ensure that surviving family members and others who inherit or receive property generally have the same protections under the CFPB’s mortgage servicing rules as the original borrower.
“The Consumer Bureau is committed to ensuring that homeowners and struggling borrowers are treated fairly by mortgage servicers and that no one is wrongly foreclosed upon,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “These updates to the rule will give greater protections to mortgage borrowers, particularly surviving family members and other successors in interest, who often are especially vulnerable.”
Mortgage servicers are responsible for collecting payments from the mortgage borrower and forwarding those payments to the owner of the loan. They typically handle customer service, collections, loan modifications, and foreclosures. To address widespread mortgage servicing problems, the CFPB established common-sense rules for servicers that went into effect on January 10, 2014.
The CFPB issued proposed amendments to those rules in November 2014, and the final rule issued today adopts many of the proposed provisions. However, the Bureau made a number of changes in the final rule after considering comments received from the public.
The rule issued today establishes new protections for consumers, including:
  • Requiring servicers to provide certain borrowers with foreclosure protections more than once over the life of the loan: Under the CFPB’s existing rules, a mortgage servicer must give borrowers certain foreclosure protections, including the right to be evaluated under the CFPB’s requirements for options to avoid foreclosure, only once during the life of the loan. Today’s final rule will require that servicers give those protections again for borrowers who have brought their loans current at any time since submitting the prior complete loss mitigation application. This change will be particularly helpful for borrowers who obtain a permanent loan modification and later suffer an unrelated hardship – such as the loss of a job or the death of a family member – that could otherwise cause them to face foreclosure.
  • Expanding consumer protections to surviving family members and other homeowners: If a borrower dies, existing CFPB rules require that servicers have policies and procedures in place to promptly identify and communicate with family members, heirs, or other parties, known as “successors in interest,” who have a legal interest in the home. Today’s final rule establishes a broad definition of successor in interest that generally includes persons who receive property upon the death of a relative or joint tenant; as a result of a divorce or legal separation; through certain trusts; or from a spouse or parent. The final rule ensures that those confirmed as successors in interest will generally receive the same protections under the CFPB’s mortgage servicing rules as the original borrower. 
  • Providing more information to borrowers in bankruptcy: Under the CFPB’s existing mortgage rules, servicers do not have to provide periodic statements or early intervention loss mitigation information to borrowers in bankruptcy. Today’s final rule generally requires, subject to certain exemptions, that servicers provide those borrowers periodic statements with specific information tailored for bankruptcy, as well as a modified written early intervention notice to let those borrowers know about loss mitigation options. Servicers also currently do not have to provide early intervention loss mitigation information to borrowers who have told the servicer to stop contacting them under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. Today’s final rule generally requires servicers to provide modified written early intervention notices to let those borrowers also know about loss mitigation options.
  • Requiring servicers to notify borrowers when loss mitigation applications are complete: Whether a borrower is entitled to key foreclosure protections depends in part on the date a borrower completes a loss mitigation application. If consumers do not know the status of their application, they cannot know the status of those foreclosure protections. Today’s final rule requires servicers to notify borrowers promptly and in writing that the application is complete, so that borrowers know the status of the application and have more information about their protections.
  • Protecting struggling borrowers during servicing transfers: When mortgages are transferred from one servicer to another, borrowers who had applied to the prior servicer for loss mitigation may not know where they stand with the new servicer. Today’s final rule clarifies that generally the new servicer must comply with the loss mitigation requirements within the same timeframes that applied to the transferor servicer, but provides limited extensions to these timeframes under certain circumstances. If a borrower submits an application shortly before transfer, the new servicer must send an acknowledgment notice within 10 business days of the transfer date. If the borrower’s application was complete prior to transfer, the new servicer must evaluate it within 30 days of the transfer date. If the new servicer needs more information to evaluate the application, the borrower would retain some foreclosure protections in the meantime. If the borrower submits an appeal, the new servicer has 30 days to make a determination on the appeal.
  • Clarifying servicers’ obligations to avoid dual-tracking and prevent wrongful foreclosures: The CFPB’s existing rules prohibit servicers from taking certain actions in foreclosure once they receive a complete loss mitigation application from a borrower more than 37 days prior to a scheduled sale. However, in some cases, borrowers are not receiving this protection, and servicers’ foreclosure counsel may not be taking adequate steps to delay foreclosure proceedings or sales. The CFPB’s new rule clarifies that, if a servicer has already made the first foreclosure notice or filing and receives a timely complete application, servicers and their foreclosure counsel must not move for a foreclosure judgment or order of sale, or conduct a foreclosure sale, even if a third party conducts the sale proceedings, unless the borrower’s loss mitigation application is properly denied, withdrawn, or the borrower fails to perform on a loss mitigation agreement. The clarifications will aid servicers in complying with, and assist courts in applying, the dual-tracking prohibitions in foreclosure proceedings to prevent wrongful foreclosures.
  • Clarifying when a borrower becomes delinquent: Several of the consumer protections under the CFPB’s existing rules depend upon how long a consumer has been delinquent on a mortgage. Today’s final rule clarifies that delinquency, for purposes of the servicing rules, begins on the date a borrower’s periodic payment becomes due and unpaid. When a borrower misses a periodic payment but later makes it up, if the servicer applies that payment to the oldest outstanding periodic payment, the date the borrower’s delinquency began advances. The final rule also allows servicers the discretion, under certain circumstances, to consider a borrower as having made a timely payment even if the borrower’s payment falls short of a full periodic payment. The increased clarity will help ensure borrowers are treated uniformly and fairly.
Today’s final rule makes additional changes to the CFPB’s mortgage servicing rules. These changes include providing flexibility for servicers to comply with certain force-placed insurance and periodic statement disclosure requirements. The changes also clarify several requirements regarding early intervention, loss mitigation, information requests, and prompt crediting of payments, as well as the small servicer exemption. Further, the changes exempt servicers from providing periodic statements under certain circumstances when the servicer has charged off the mortgage. Finally, concurrently with the final rule, the CFPB is issuing an interpretive rule under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act relating to servicers’ compliance with certain mortgage servicing provisions as amended by the final rule.
Most of the provisions of the final rule will take effect 12 months after publication in the Federal Register. The provisions relating to successors in interest and the provisions relating to periodic statements for borrowers in bankruptcy will take effect 18 months after publication in the Federal Register.
###

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is a 21st century agency that helps consumer finance markets work by making rules more effective, by consistently and fairly enforcing those rules, and by empowering consumers to take more control over their economic lives. For more information, visit www.consumerfinance.gov.


  • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

  • Please contact us if you need help or resources as we are here and happy to help!

  • Respectfully,

  • Dana Shafman
  • Managing Member
  • END Consulting
  • (888) 234-7006 Ext 101
  • Dana@ConsultingEND.com

  • www.TheDailyComplaint.com


Wednesday, August 12, 2015

Here's One Thing the CFPB Gets Right

BY

AUG 11, 2015 5:35pm ET

There are many concerning aspects of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's methods, not the least of which include its proclivity to regulate via enforcement and its reliance on overly broad and ambiguous languageto support its activities.

But when it comes to regulating Unfair, Deceptive, or Abusive Acts or Practices, the CPFB's actions have, for the most part, been reasonably warranted.

The CFPB recently took a series of UDAAP actions addressing a variety of wrongs in cases where, based on the allegations in recent cases, the misconduct was palpable.

In one case, a mortgage servicer was fined and forced to pay damages for allegedly failing to honor trial modification periods from prior servicers and for unnecessarily prolonging trial modification periods.

n another case, a debt collector was hit with penalties for purportedly making false threats against consumers and collecting debts consumers did not owe.

Lastly, a mortgage servicer was pounded for falsely making claims of savings by collecting bimonthly payments that did not actually result in the savings promised. In addition, the servicer allegedly did not make the payments on behalf of consumers at the times promised.

While the CFPB's self-creation, and expansion, of omnipotent power is disturbing and worrisome for the future, for the present moment it appears the agency tactically chooses cases where the potential for objection is limited. Lenders should keep this in mind this when balancing current compliance and business needs.

Ari Karen is a partner at Offit Kurman

Comments (1)
As one of the 26,000 MLO's sponsored by one of the 12,000 state licensed mortgage shops that work under the cloud of obscure regulation implemented for all the wrong reasons, it is not encouraging when attorneys applaud the CFPB for "getting it right" when in order to get it right they really have to figure out the distribution system and where the harm really has its genesis. All one has to do is look to the disparate treatment of delivery segments, check out the consumer complaints and it becomes clear that the Bureau has no clue - servicing and loan mods caused collateral damage and should receive scrutiny and redirection - but the Bureau is too free to blame and assault others for fabricated UDAP! Please don't publicly applaud them - even a blind squirrel can find an acorn!
Posted by BillK | Wednesday, August 12 2015 at 8:45AM ET

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Please contact us if you need help or resources as we are here and happy to help!

Respectfully,

Dana Shafman
Managing Member
END Consulting
(888) 234-7006 Ext 101
Dana@ConsultingEND.com


Tuesday, July 7, 2015

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE

NATIONSTAR COMPLAINT:

Submitted:      July 2015
Reported By:     John Maresca in Cherry Hill, NJ
Report Link:   CLICKHERE

Won't Send Me My Money

My mortgage was sold to Nationstar by Bank of America. I immediately looked up the company and saw reviews of how terrible their service, customer support, and website was. I also saw the lawsuits brought upon Nationstar. I immediately refinanced with Quicken. My mortgage was paid off a month ago and they won't send my large escrow check to me. They're sitting on it probably to make interest off of it. I was given conflicting information from different customer support people about my check being sent, not being sent, dates the money cleared, etc. That's when I could get through to anyone. They won't send my check in anything with a tracking number or bank wire. They're straight up liars and thieves. Do everything in your power to stay FAR AWAY from this company!

END CONSULTING ADVICE:

Hi John,

Nationstar Mortgage is known for violating the rights of their clients and consumers as you know but you do not have to sit back and take it! You have so many consumer rights and consumer protections afforded you and the CFPB would be an excellent place to start to voice your complaint as it only takes a few minutes to submit the complaint online to the CFPB and you do not have to deal with any Nationstar Mortgage customer service runarounds anymore. Your NJ Attorney General would also be an excellent person as well to voice your concerns.

In fact, we covered your complaint today on our radio show The Daily Complaint and provided a pathway for success to include how to contact the CFPB - thank you for posting your complaint online via Complaints Board so that others will have the opportunity to learn from your experiences in dealing with Nationstar Mortgage. There are firm rules in place with regard to escrow accounts and correcting errors made by the servicer in a timely manner but you must know your rights in order to exercise your rights.

In addition to submitting complaints to the CFPB and the NJ AG, I would suggest preparing a QWR or Request for information for Nationstar Mortgage that you can submit via fax or email – you can learn how through the CFPB by typing in QWR in their search bar and you never have to speak with them again. They are required to acknowledge the QWR or Request for information per RESPA in 5 business days and answer it in 30 business days or you do have recourse, so listen to us address your complaint on The Daily Complaint today and contact us if you need further information on how to not only attack your problem but to get the solutions that you are seeking. You can absolutely hold Nationstar Mortgage accountable for their actions while obtaining your refund in an expeditious manner.

Good luck!

Respectfully,

Dana Shafman
Managing Member
END Consulting
(888) 234-7006 Ext 101